83
submitted 2 weeks ago by Szrda@szmer.info to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Any hot war is going to expend that in weeks or less. Laudable perhaps to describe war as insane - but not exactly realistic.

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

NATO military doctrine doesn't require as many tanks has the Soviet doctrine, which Russia is still using, does.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

So, what - do you think this is just mismanagement of funds? Possibly to meet the minimum defense spending, I suppose. It could be.

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well it's the military, so mismanagement of funds is a given. But that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that this number was probably aligned with the rest of NATO already, and that NATO doesn't expect to lose 180 tanks by driving them single-file on a highway.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's 180 in that first batch. Contract apparently is for 1,000. With a joint effort of production, so the last batch will be fully assembled in Poland.

[-] juan@lemmings.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

180 tanks in a week? No way.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)

World News

382 readers
422 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS