379

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Would get divided based on your share.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Except in cuckoo-land (UK) where most apartment owners don’t own any part of the land where their property is built. It’s called a leasehold and is batshit insane.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

So rental that gives the same development right as owning the place but without it being for an indefinite length of time? So you need to have a return on investment before the lease expires otherwise why not just go for a normal rent? 🤔

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
379 points (85.6% liked)

Economics

1713 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS