22
Streetlamp Frolic (by Pita Potato)
(cdn.imgchest.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
22 points (77.5% liked)
Imaginary Witches
1642 readers
60 users here now
Imaginary Witches
A community to share images of witches and any other witch adjacent characters like dark summoners, necromancers or mages with a witchy vibe.
Rules
Posting
- Use the following format for post titles: {artwork title} by {artist}
- Add [OC] in front of the title if it's made by yourself
- If no artwork title is known use "Untitled"
- Include the source link in the post body
- Mark posts as NSFW when necessary (nudity/violence)
Content
- Shared artwork must contain a witch or witch adjacent character
- No screenshots from movies or games
- No AI art
- Depictions of artistic nudity are allowed
- Depictions of blood and violence are allowed
- Imagery of pornographic and sexual activity is not allowed
- Extreme gore is not allowed
Icon and Banner credits
- Icon: Witch by z--ed
- Banner: Witch House by VityaR83
More Communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, visibly trans people are nsfw, i guess. Children shouldn't have to see that.
Flaunting your genitals is nsfw. Being trans has nothing to do with it.
So amab people should not be pictured wearing pants?
Are you being purposefully obtuse?
A. Art depicting figures that happen to be wearing regular clothing = sfw
B. Art depicting figures wearing clothing that intentionally accentuates the genitals = nsfw
The operative word is "intentionally".
The art here is clearly 'B'.
Yeah, no, trans people are inherently vulgar but cis men are fine. I get it.
Look back through the community and you'll see that skimpy clothing and nudity are marked NSFW regardless of their gender.
Cool are you gonna retcon your reasoning to that?
Look through the nsfw posts in this community, look through the rest of my posts. Whether you're satisfied or not isn't my problem, I'm not posting for you.
It's just that's not what you said initially.
I said the character had a visible bulge, thanks to their skimpy clothing. Thus its marked nsfw. A man with a bulging cock through his underwear would get the same mark.