138
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
138 points (97.3% liked)
Gaming
3818 readers
76 users here now
The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community
For news, discussions and memes!
Community Rules
This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:
- No NSFW content
You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.
What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:
- Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
- Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
- Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
- Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
- Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.
If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Per the article, it wasn't a pirated game though, it was used. That's the issue here.
They can be ban happy with pirates if they want, but banning people from being able to just swap games in real life is fuckin dumb.
Well technically, it was both, at least from their perspective. And as soon as they were contacted, the situation was resolved.
I'm not saying I wouldn't be pissed if this happened to me, and I'm not saying I like the whole "we block your internet access" thing. But what I'm saying is that this is normal practice for decades (!!!) now for all console manufacturers, and that the only reason why this is a "news article" now is because "Nintendo = bad" clicks so damn well.
And on a side note, let's please not forget that there was ONE reported case. One. Not a systemic issue, maybe even just a technical quirk.
Banning people who play games they bought second hand most definitely is not an industry practice for decades for all console manufacturers.
Nintendo thought is was pirated. The original seller copied the game, then sold the original and kept the copy. Nintendo saw both copies running at the same time and disabled them both.
They don't care. They're on a mission. Let's move on.
I can't think of a single console that normalized banning people for buying used games...except for switch 2. Wanna give some examples?