Can we at least mention, though, that that's kind of nonsensical, too? Give me a *very* high-level summary of what changed, but then the rest of the commit message should be the why (unless that's genuinely obvious, like when adding a feature).

If I actually want to know what changed, I can look at the code changes. I can't find the why anywhere else, though. Nor can an LLM having to describe those random code changes.

I'm now tempted to do this for all several thousand commits in the main branch, and at the very least create a better changelog.