121

The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed.

I'm really not a fan of the cops arguing that the cyclist was partly to blame, though, and a €1000 fine is pretty damn low for breaking someone's leg and wrecking a good six months of their life.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alaphic@lemmy.world 71 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair, I also fail to see how wearing a helmet would've prevented his leg from being broken as well

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the helmet is a bit much.

Not wearing appropriate clothing and headphones while on the road is a fair point though.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 40 points 3 weeks ago

What's clothing that allows me to not be at fault for being run over?

I thought traffic laws are only about having two breaks, lights at night etc

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not talking about being at fault.

I don't care about court, I'd rather not be run over.

This case seems like an honest accident, I don't think the driver is too blame too much here. The cyclist got into a blind spot (which is why I hate roundabouts for cyclists) and got hit.

Nobody seems truly at fault here, but making others more aware of yourself, and being more aware yourself might have made this avoidable.

Bad road design is yet again the biggest party to blame here.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

You have to drive in a way that accounts for bad road design though. if you have to crawl around a corner you can't see well then you have to do that.

It is your responsibility as a driver to make sure that you can safely stop within the distance you can see, at all times.

If you can only see 10cm around the corner, then you have to drive at 5cm/s

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 7 points 3 weeks ago

If the cyclist got in that bad of a blind spot, then the taxi must have been HUGE. We have boatloads of roundabouts in NL and they are just fine.

[-] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I’m with you on that. Where I live some roafs in the city are not lit and people will wear dark clothes and bike at night without lights. Sometimes you don’t even see them until you’re right on top of them.

It can be kind of scary and even when being careful, there is a risk of hitting someone.

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Something reasonably reflective and visible in low light.

[-] RejZoR@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 weeks ago

Don't dress like a fucking ninja in all black that you are only visible when you're looking at me through a windshield while being on my car's hood. That's how. If anything pisses me off is people like this with lights that have battery from 5 years ago that barely makes them working. Or preferably no lights at all riding a bicycle at dawn. It's like fucks have a death wish or something.

The difference between black shirt and a fluorescent red/orange/yellow/green/blue shirt is MASSIVE. You can spot a cyclist wearing these from kilometer away. Black one, few hundred meters or even less if it's road through shade/forest. I'm a cyclist too and all my shirts are such bright colors because I want to be sure I'm visible to others on the roads.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago

Not wearing appropriate clothing and headphones while on the road is a fair point though.

I've nearly been hit several times (like tires screaching to a halt) while wearing high-viz clothing with the right of way.

It makes no difference when the driver isn't paying attention.

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

It makes a huge difference if you yourself are paying attention, which seems hard wearing headphones.

And honestly, you said it yourself. "Nearly" hit. Could've been worse if you weren't wearing high-viz clothing.

I cycle daily and just notice how little people are aware of blind spots, cyclists and drivers alike. No harm in driving a little slower, even when you have right of way.

[-] brotundspiele@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

It makes a huge difference if you yourself are paying attention, which seems hard wearing headphones.

What about the driver? Did he listen to the radio? If it seems so hard to pay attention while wearing headphones, why is it still allowed to sell car radios?

wearing high-viz clothing [...] how little people are aware of blind spots

How does wearing high-viz clothing help you when you are in a blind spot? And why does no one ask which colour the taxi was? Was it high-viz or maybe gray or black like most cars?

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Drivers also aren’t allowed headphones where I’m from. If the cyclist had a boombox strapped to his bike, that would be comparable to a car radio, but headphones block your perception of external sound a lot more than music from a speaker

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago

No its not. The driver is at fault.

Do not blame the victim.

The driver was at fault.

You can wear whatever clothes you like if you’re on a bike. Just like you don’t have to paint your car a specific colour to be allowed to drive.

And drivers are allowed to blast music so cyclists should as well. All the safety shouldn’t fall on cyclist double standards.

[-] Naich@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I've had drivers not see me and pull out in front of me in broad daylight when I've been wearing a luminous orange top, while riding a bike with a bright flashing front light. What more should I have done to not make it my fault? Set off fireworks?

[-] rollerbang@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I guess drivers with black cars, gray cars, ... Should also be partially blamed for the accidents with other vehicles when "not guilty", because they aren't visible enough...

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago

If they didn't have their lights on, they ARE

[-] rollerbang@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And yet nobody ever will think about holding the color against them. Lights on or off.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
121 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12798 readers
161 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS