735
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
735 points (98.9% liked)
Trippin' Through Time
4924 readers
283 users here now
Tripping' Through Time
A Lemmy community for historic art pieces overhauled into modern memes.
Rules
- Only image uploads allowed
- Only edited, historical images may be shared
- The instance rules of https://lemmy.ca/
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I think Chad's got the right attitude
Exactly, working harder than the bare minimum not to be fired will not get you rewarded.
"Take what you can, give nothing back"
it can get you rewarded, up to a point
my company reached that point. 50 people and now working all that extra doesn't get me anything else. it did when we were sub 30 people
so I backed off. if I won't be paid more for it, I'm not gonna stress myself out like that
I think it can work only in small companies. I used to work in a place that had 15 people total, and our compensation was tied directly to company revenue. Not even individual performance, company performance. And each one of us had a direct impact on it.
It was one of the healthiest job environments ever. Burnout was a risk, but even that was manageable with conscious planning.
I was so much happier working my ass off with only two dozen people at the company total than I am now with double that.
When you're a small company, everybody matters and everybody needs to be good at what they do, and it's easy to communicate and keep everybody up to date. We've reached that size where not everybody is great, and their performance (or lack thereof) affects your own work. and then it cascades from there.