this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
805 points (99.0% liked)
People Twitter
7817 readers
964 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If this was in 2002, there were also only 251 or 386 Pokemon depending on when in the year it was done (Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire released in November 2002)
Not to mention a huge chunk of those Pokemon at that time were just evolution phases, sharing very similar names as their base (e.g. Charmander, Charmeleon, and then Charizard). Additionally, each evolution phase looks pretty similar to the prior. That in comparison to, say, many different varieties of ants, wasps, birds, etc. that don't look that different at a distance, especially to an 8-year-old.
Don't forget the mimic species that evolution selected for because they look like something else. Even the most complex video game is nothing compared to nature's complexity. I'd love to learn about geology, but look at how many variations there are in just one group of minerals. Biochemistry is the real misleading one - "I'm just a few types of atoms" Yeah, in a shitload of combinations.
And all pokemon of a species usually look the same! Very few gendered traits, age differences (unless you count evolution, and that still counts for more species in pokemon than irl), season differences, plain old individual differences, etc.