Can a stochastic process be considered 'automation'? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 months ago by patatas@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thinking specifically about AI here: if a process does not give a consistent or predictable output (and cannot reliably replace work done by humans) then can it really be considered "automation"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

If it's "good enough" for the task, yes.

Many tasks have loose success parameters, and an acceptable failure rate. If the automation fits in those, and it simplifies my day, then it's reasonable automation.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025

26 points (93.3% liked)

Asklemmy

50772 readers

612 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS