143
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Rooskie91@discuss.online to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

Even if we take into consideration that 90% (out of 25) could be lying (they aren't), that's still ~3 women he assaulted.

Edit: Damn y'all, thanks for that old internet feeling I keep coming back to Lemmy for. Not a girl in sight in these comments.

Is testifying under oath not considered evidence? There have been so many credible lawsuits against this guy for sexual assault. Honestly what are these files going to prove that we don't already have plenty of evidence for?

And lastly, do you have any idea what going after a rich powerful man for sexually assaulting you does to your life? Why the fuck would anybody put themselves through that if they weren't absolutely sure they had a credible case? Some of the plaintiffs in these cases had their lives and their family's lives threatened and disrupted.

Welp, to the bottom with me I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't care who is accused - I refuse to convict anyone on anything just from an accusation.

More people making a similar accusation isn't evidence, at best that's a witch hunt.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I also that, but I'm also in support of massively reforging the legal system so that everyone can and will use it appropriately.

Which a large part of that will be changing how it is funded and expanding it all that appearing before a court to have your case heard is as easy as possible.

Any issue before a court shouldn't be swayed so easily by how much money you can spend on it, or how long you can tie up the issue to delay and it avoid resolution.

It's a weird situation where I think more is better

[-] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

You have no idea what you're talking about.

Witness testimony in court is not "just an accusation". It's corroborated by cross examination.

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You have no idea what you're talking about.

This is pretty ironic.

Witness testimony in court is not “just an accusation”. It’s corroborated by cross examination.

Cross examination is where the opposing council questions the witness in an attempt to poke holes in their testimony, point out inconsistencies and otherwise discredit the witness.

While corroboration means:

To strengthen or support with other evidence; make more certain. synonym: confirm.

Cross examination, be definition, is the exact opposite of corroboration.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
143 points (78.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

36726 readers
57 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS