-35

What is Lemmy's problem with AI? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by WaffleWarrior@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My understanding is most of you are anti AI? My only question is....why? It is the coolest invention since the Internet and it is remarkable how close it can resemble actual consciousness. No joke the AI in sci fi movies is worse than what we actually have in many ways!

Don't get me wrong, I am absolutely anti "AI baked into my operating system and cell phone so that it can monitor me and sell me crap". If that's what being Anti AI is.....to that I say Amen.

But simply not liking a privacy conscious experience or utilization of AI at all? I'm not getting it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

with art the living standard is already effectively “maxed out”

Quite frankly, it's not. Now "video on demand" means that you can sit on your couch and start the movie when you want. Tomorrow it may mean that you will also decide the content. Another sequel of Star Wars? Sure! A new season of Game of Thrones? No problem!

Moreover, AI is being used to create products and also in scientific research. It's already improving our standards.

Yes but it should disappear back into the direction of many smaller websites and more privacy, not in the direction of all of that texture being totally consumed by LLM generated search results and everyone further congregating on a smaller number of sites that collect every iota of data possible.

My guess? AI will kill the cheap stuff, but internet will not change much overall and surely not rapidly.

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

I don't think you understood what I meant by increasing demand/consumption. "Another sequel of Star Wars" or "A new season of Game of Thrones" aren't increasing demand for art, they're replacing previous forms of art with generated forms. And the usefulness of machine learning in fields like medical research is great - but it isn't going to massively increase consumption.

[-] JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

I see your point. Assuming that in the future we will consume content as we do today, you are probably right.

My point is a bit different though: things will change. Famously in the 70s somebody didn't see the point of having a computer at home because nobody would need the stuff that computers could do in that period. Then needs changed, new needs came, computers evolved, and now we have computers even in our pockets. With AI it will likely be the same.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025

-35 points (34.8% liked)

Asklemmy

49785 readers

683 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS