133
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
133 points (97.8% liked)
United Kingdom
5234 readers
381 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's why they need to change the law in order to ban it. Duh
ok soooo.... then you're like making the legal age 20 rather than 18? What next 20 year olds are now barely legal? So we would have to make 20 year olds illegal now right? Whats the REAL legal age??
Just make the legal age of performers 85, it'll vastly reduce the number of porn viewers.
Don't underestimate gooners
The classic slippery slope, thin end of the wedge argument.
A reasonable position, you're gonna need some evidence of intention or history to give it some heft though.
Anything claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
We have a legal age of 18. Some people make porn that is "barely legal". The intention is to make that illegal. The evidence is in the article.
Is that evidence of your point of a creeping line of illegality?