194
submitted 1 day ago by solo@piefed.social to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] solo@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago

The super rich are (...) a vast minority

It seems to me that the math in this is overwhelming. If a single person in this minority emits in 90min more than an average person in their lifetime, we should take into consideration that their lifetime is made of many, many, many 90min slots.

Apart from that of course I'm all in for sustainable living and redistribution of wealth for lower classes. Preferably abolish the class-system all together, of course.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I would be interested in seeing the methodology behind that figure. If Jeff Bezoz's emissions include his ownership share of the emissions by the Amazon corporation (which is a major part of the world's logistical system at this point), then no doubt, but getting rid of old Jeff wouldn't eliminate those emissions. I rest my case that half of all fossil fuels in the world aren't going directly into their jets and yachts.

[-] solo@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

I would be interested in seeing the methodology behind that figure

If you click on the relevant link above, you will find the report itself. You can even download the methodology note seperately.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yes, sorry I really should've sat down and done that to begin with.

Billionaires’ lifestyle emissions dwarf those of ordinary people, but the emissions from their investments are dramatically higher still —the average investment emissions of 50 of the world’s richest billionaires are around 340 times their emissions from private jets and superyachts combined.

Well, there it is.

Edit: If there were 8 billion Amazon corporations, we would've shot past Venus a long time ago. The 90 minute mark seems to correspond to this. Getting rid of fifty (number of billionaires examined in the study) superyachts and a hundred 24/7 flying private jets would be next to nothing compared to the emissions from wider economy which they control, but which wouldn't go away when the guillotine does its thing.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
194 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7062 readers
611 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS