233
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] qaz@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~I've never bought a porn game nor ever played one, but I just think it's stupid that such large companies fold to a lobby organization and start moderating the sale of products.~~ ~~Christian fundamentalist activists are persistent and organized, and it's effective. I think it's bad how a small minority is able to dictate the lives of other people and I like how people get riled up because I hope it will remind the people in charge of those large corporations that catering to extremists is a bad decision.~~

~~TLDR: Idgaf about the games, I just hate it when religious zealots dictate the lives of others.~~

EDIT: I might have been wrong about "Collective Shout" and didn't look into it enough before forming an opinion.

EDIT 2: Yeah, I don't think "Incest Daughters BDSM" deserves saving. They seem to be primarily targeting rape and incest games, and I can definitely understand that you want to see rape games gone from if you're an organisation like this. Article However, I still don't know how accurate their own article is, I might check out more sources/perspectives when I have time.

EDIT 3: My initial assessment seems to be correct, a large amount of games are affected and the “policies” seem to be enforced with a disregard for accuracy. The organization also seems to be more extreme.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

How about Detroit: Become Human? Because they removed that as well.

[-] Yttra@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm against the censorship, to be clear, but a David Cage game might not be the best example to use in the future lol

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why? Because you don't like them?

It's a perfect example, because there's nothing even close to pornographic in that game. The only possible reason would be because there's a lesbian android couple that runs off together (if you let them).

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago

There's a solid argument that most of the porn games are some form of sexual abuse. You could argue that adults should be allowed to commit fake sexual abuse but its still likely not a positive for those who consume it.

Its interesting noone here has argued for porn games, just against censorship.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

You could argue that adults should be allowed to commit fake sexual abuse but its still likely not a positive for those who consume it.

Should they be allowed to commit fake physical abuse? There are a lot of "violent" video games out there as well.

[-] Nelots@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Right. Most of us don't care about the porn, which is why we're not arguing for it. Most of us just don't like credit card companies being allowed to dictate what we do and don't buy.

Plus, I'm guessing anybody with an incest fetish probably understands that isn't something to go shouting to the world if they want their position to be taken seriously.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
233 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

73944 readers
735 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS