34

A recent test shows that Quidnet’s technology can store energy in pressurized water underground for months at a time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Badabinski@kbin.earth 14 points 3 days ago

I wonder if this suffers from the same power density issue as most alternatives to pumped hydro systems. It's REALLY hard to do better than megatons of water pumped 500 meters up a hill.

[-] spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

yeah, the scalability of this seems like a pretty big challenge

annoyingly, they talk about the amount of water they pumped only in terms of energy (35MWh) and not in terms of water volume.

I think they do that because, if you estimate the water volume...it's pretty unimpressive.

going off the numbers for Bath County Pumped Storage Station, the largest in the US, and until 2021 the largest in the world:

total storage capacity of 24,000 MWh - meaning that this power station built in the late 70s / early 80s has almost 700 times the storage capacity of this 35MWh demo

between their upper reservoir and lower reservoir, their water capacity is 78.4 million cubic meters. so as a crude estimate, Quidnet's demo project used ~115,000 cubic meters.

Olympic swimming pool contains 2.500 cubic meters. so, again with the caveat that this is a rough estimate because Quidnet didn't publish the actual numbers...this demo they're bragging about involved 45 Olympic swimming pools worth of water.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Obviously, assuming you have that hill.
Slightly harder to do in places like the Netherlands for example, where the tallest hill is 322 metres, and the second tallest that isn't part of that same mountain range near the Belgium border is just 110.

And in the US, Florida, Delaware, Louisiana, Mississippi, Indiana, and Illinois are actually flatter than the Netherlands - sure, the highest point in Indiana (Hoosier Hill) is 383 metres from the sea level, but the lowest point in the entire state is 98 metres above.

[-] SteevyT@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the cycling world it's kinda funny how people try to make a low climbing century (100 mile route) as a first go, and where I am I have a glut of choices for centuries with well under 1,000 meters of climbing. I just cleared out a bunch of my routes, and still have two century routes with under 600m of climbing.

[-] Badabinski@kbin.earth 1 points 3 days ago

True! I just wonder how much energy they'd realistically be able to store for a given amount of resources. Like, does this have the same issues as Lifted Weight Storage? Where the energy density just doesn't really make sense once you get right down to it. I don't know the relevant math to determine how much water and at what pressures might be required to scale this up to the 500MWh/1GWh range. It might be perfectly fine.

EDIT: fuck man I'm not writing well today. edited to make me sound like less of a cretin

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
34 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

39939 readers
440 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS