379
Landlords should have to pay income tax on their rental properties regardless of whether they're rented out or not. (gothamist.com)
submitted 1 year ago by CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to c/economics@lemmy.ml
120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TAG@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What is the incentive for the landlord to keep the building occupied? Why not just immediately tear it down and build luxury apartments?

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The incentive is that the building was built with a grant from the government to help initial building costs with the promise that it would be section 8 for X years, but section 8 doesn't get landlords rich, so they look for loopholes to get around it. One of them is keeping the building vacant for those years and then "renovating" to make more money off of the tenants that aren't section 8.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
379 points (85.6% liked)

Economics

1734 readers
5 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml