130
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

I'm faster than anyone who works there, and I don't need to worry about long lines (usually the self checkout is the faster option). The time saved is my payment.

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago

I would be faster, if the tills didn't have a bloody delay after placing the item in the bag, before it will scan the next one.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

"Please place the item in the bagging area!!!"

[-] Godnroc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

"Unexpected item in the bagging area." "Please place the item in the bagging area." "Unexpected item in the bagging area." "Please wait for assistance."

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

This was funny like a decade ago when it was commonplace.

Stores in my area solved that at least 6 years ago, maybe even earlier than that.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, even in South Central area of LA where I am, the system is quite responsive at the Food 4 Less.

[-] Godnroc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Stores near me first put in self checkouts around a decade ago and still have the original, problematic machines. It's the newer stores or ones recently renovated that have upgraded, but that is rare.

[-] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago
[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

I didnt realize places still did that, I haven't heard that annoying line in a few years.

[-] Prox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Y'know that grocery stores could simply staff enough checkout registers and then all this self-checkout time-savings goes away, right? The stores - following the airline model - created a problem for the consumer (long checkout lines due to understaffing) and then effectively sold the customer the solution (you do your own labor, but grocery prices stay the same).

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

"If" in one hand, shit in the other. Which fills up first?

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Back in the day, I shopped at the one grocery store in a bit of a food desert. They'd have all...I don't remember 10? 12?...checkout lines open all day, and you're still guaranteed to spend half an hour in line. If they could have replaced 2 checkout lines with 6 self-check kiosks, or 4 & 12, it would have helped a lot, but they hadn't been invented yet.

Now, I shop in a better neighborhood where they have 6 kiosks, one staffed checkout, and 8 lanes closed. Start with a technical solution to a real problem, and some MBA is going to come in and figure out how to turn it back into a problem.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Until you get stuck between Ethel (who is trying to fill out a paper check and make small talk because she's lonely) and Bob (who has no sense of personal space and smells like he doesn't know how to wipe).

Non-self-checkout sucks.

[-] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

following the airline model

? Are you talking about, like, baggage prices?

Iirc, airline margins are super thin, and their customers are extremely price sensitive. In order to stay competitive, airlines need to be able to sell their customers on the lowest possible flight price, while still not losing money on every single flight. The solution is to charge the customer more directly for the scarce resources they use on a flight. Extra weight on the plane means more fuel used to reach the destination. Charging for each checked bag rewards people for travelling light, while giving everyone a free bag punishes the light traveller with higher fares. Sure, the byzantine fee structure in the booking process is annoying - but at the end of the day, flights are now extremely cheap historically speaking, and a pay-for-what-you-use model makes sense.

Of course, the actual solution is to have a better system of busses and trains. And the airline industry is always lobbying against that. But I'm not sure what the comparable action in the grocery industry would be.

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The time saved is my payment.

This point seems to get missed on all these "I don't work here" arguments. Yeah, I don't work here, so I'd like to be in and out quickly so I can spend my precious free time for things I actually like to do. If "time is money" anyway, then what's the difference? I'd rather scan my own things, skip the chitchat, and reclaim the personal time I would've spent waiting.

[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Added bonus of not having to talk to anybody.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Same. But I would also be fine with it taking longer just to not have human interaction, unless I'm in the mood for that or the cashier looks bored...

[-] FishFace@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

How can you be faster when you have to both scan and bag everything, whereas at the human checkout you only have to bag?

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

At my local shop, some of the cashiers are extremely slow at bagging… Often I end up when bags that are way too heavy, and sometimes my bread is all smushed. I don’t fault them, I can’t imagine they’re being paid a reasonable wage.

I am absolutely faster doing it myself.

[-] FishFace@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

So... you can bag while the cashier scans, right? Splitting the work, making it quicker.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Nope, not the way my store is laid out. Unless I wanna snuggle up next to them behind the counter. Which both they, and I, absolutely do not want.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Amusing that you think the employees scanning shit aren't also the ones bagging it.

But to answer your question, I'm faster because I have an incentive to get shit scanned and bagged, vs just riding the till for 8 hours.

[-] FishFace@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

OK, so the reason is because in the situation with two people, you fail to make use of both to make it go faster, and instead just stand around.

So if speed were the priority, I have a suggestion for you.

[-] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Because I care about leaving, so I do everything I can to be faster. In economics, this is known as the principle-agent problem. At my local walmart, it is known as "I'm not a septuagenarian who's been hitting a vape pen for the last 5 hours."

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because I worked as a package clerk as a kid, some 30 years ago. They spent a week training us to be cashiers and how to pack groceries as optimally and quickly as possible. And most places around here, the timing of the cashier is not good, especially since we usually have to pack our own groceries anyway.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Hint, they're probably not. They perceive themselves as faster, but on average the employees are.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

You must have some speedy cashiers at your local store!

[-] halvar@lemy.lol 0 points 1 month ago

I lose all saved time when trying to get through the exit gate that needs to see my receipt from all angles before letting me through.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

where is this that you are made to stop? I just keep walking and say ‘if you wanted to see my receipt then open another cashier lane and scan items yourself. It’s my property now.”

[-] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's a lot of words to say while not breaking stride. I just hand them my reciept and thank them for taking my garbage.

[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

Pretty common in german supermarkets in my experience, at least those that only introduced self-checkout recently (so most of who even got one). The gates need to scan the barcode on your receipt. Not really a noteworthy timeloss in my experience though.

It's still a very uncommon thing in general, my local supermarket even got rid of automated coin counters on normal checkouts again because they worked so bad (refused even slightly dirty coins) and made things slower.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

ahh ok. in the US there are some private membership stores that do that. the public ones can try to stop you but you do not need to obey.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
130 points (89.6% liked)

memes

17612 readers
230 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS