151
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

So if I cause enough of a problem I can bend the will of the government.

I'm going to create a religion that gets offended that you exist, and we'll riot until that's illegal then?

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Do you really think those 2 positions are equivalent?

Like the difference between somebody being racist and somebody being offended by an action designed to offend them? Also plenty of religions don't like certain groups and protest about them but we don't give in because the world is not black and white like that. Conceding that maybe allowing people to burn religious texts of the biggest religions in the world for the sole purpose of offending those people is not a productive thing to allow in a modern society does not mean we must then concede every demand any religious body makes.

[-] generalpotato@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

If there’s a group of people with a legitimate concern, a government should hear you out and make an assessment.

You as a single person can choose to do whatever you want within reason and what’s permitted by law.

You can continue to misconstrue this further however you like, but burning books is barbaric. We’re past that point as civilized society. But feel free to continue to argue for it behind the veneer of “freedom” or whatever else you can come up with.

[-] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

burning books is barbaric

Yeah should be punished by stoning or something..............

[-] generalpotato@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Context and words must be hard for you. Sorry to heat that. Would you like a tissue or a shoulder to cry on?

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Burning individual instances of a book for artistic or political purposes, or just because you want to, is not barbaric.

Burning all copies of a book to remove it from circulation and prevent the spread of those ideas is barbaric.

[-] generalpotato@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Loud concerts are actual form of artistic expression yet there are laws in some cities that prevent loud music past 9/10pm.

Why? Because it bothers people and interferes with their lives. This is no different.

Also, I find it amusing that you think burning a book is an “artistic expression”. What’s next? Taking a shit is an artistic expression?

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

People do that too.

Loud concerts are about proximity. I'd definitely say no burning a Bible in front of a church. But if you can be easily ignored by the offended party, then you shouldn't be stopped.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
151 points (95.8% liked)

World News

39026 readers
1272 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS