729
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 85 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I scored 16/21 on https://e-mail.wtf/ and all I got was this lousy text to share on social media.

This was fun!

Edit: people, upvote the OP, not me

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago

Don't tell me what to do!

[-] lemmyng@piefed.ca 46 points 21 hours ago

13/21 here. Mostly got hung up on several "this was valid in earlier RFC, and later removed" kind of situations. There are several where I picked the correct answer, but where I know many websites that won't accept it as valid, and that's not even the more esoteric ones.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 30 points 20 hours ago

Yeah I feel like the correct answer for anything obsoleted by a more recent RFC should be "Invalid".

[-] errer@lemmy.world 37 points 16 hours ago

Complaints about the quiz? Send them to 💩@💩

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

But they will work, and according to the spec, you have to build your system so that it can handle those cases. Obsolete doesn't mean incorrect or invalid, just a "you shouldn't do this any more".

Obsolete Syntax
Earlier versions of this standard allowed for different (usually more liberal) syntax than is allowed in this version. Also, there have been syntactic elements used in messages on the Internet whose interpretation have never been documented. Though some of these syntactic forms MUST NOT be generated according to the grammar in section 3, they MUST be accepted and parsed by a conformant receiver.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2822#section-4 page 29

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 6 hours ago

Well shit, yeah, that "MUST be accepted and parsed" is pretty explicit. That sucks. What is even the point of revising standards? How the fuck do we ever get rid of some of these bad ideas?

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 16 hours ago

Some of those "obsolete" things are outright blocked for specific reasons. For example, routing addresses through multiple servers. It was abused by spammers, so it's almost always denied these days.

Looks like this:

<@foo.example.com@bar.example.com:123@example.com>
[-] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago
[-] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Me too and it said that is the amount you'd get if you just picked "valid" for every response. Lmao

[-] ReCursing@feddit.uk 3 points 19 hours ago
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago

Yay! Same. But only because I've already heard of some email craziness before.

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

yay 16/21 club

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
729 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

25802 readers
3110 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS