728
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago

I don't know if they changes the answer to the question, but it now says name@example is valid.

[-] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 27 points 15 hours ago

It does say it's valid, but also that it's obsolete, and while the RFC does define valid but obsolete specs, there is nothing defining domains without a dot as obsolete, and it is in fact defined in the regular spec, not the obsolete section

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

I see what you mean, I'm with you now.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

It says valid but obsolete, which sounds like a contradiction to me.

This is technically valid but considered obsolete. RFC 822 allowed domains without dots, but RFC 2822 made this obsolete.

Do email suffix not indicate a different domain like .org and .com for websites?

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
728 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

25802 readers
3110 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS