728
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
728 points (99.1% liked)
Programmer Humor
25802 readers
3110 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't know if they changes the answer to the question, but it now says
name@example
is valid.It does say it's valid, but also that it's obsolete, and while the RFC does define valid but obsolete specs, there is nothing defining domains without a dot as obsolete, and it is in fact defined in the regular spec, not the obsolete section
I see what you mean, I'm with you now.
It says valid but obsolete, which sounds like a contradiction to me.
Do email suffix not indicate a different domain like .org and .com for websites?