That's quite the inventive narrative, bearing no relation to anything I've said. A fictitious workflow? The only things I've talked about related workflow are bog standard collaborative software development standards. Design, implementation, review, maintenance, explainability. Who knows what is going on in your head, as you are being defensively averse to coherent and specific responses, but it is absurd to the point of dishonesty to suggest any of what I've referred to is fictitious.

At no point was I rude. But you are being very defensive (cannot take criticism of even objectively false technical claims), which I believe may be driving your inappropriate behavior. You seem to think my disagreement and corrections of false statements is somehow offensive. Please think about how this defensiveness escalated you and this conversation, as even simple things could not be agreed with re: common ground or simple factual corrections. If you avoid and deny and argue about the easy things, you simply dig a hole for yourself where you can't budge an inch and have to say increasingly ridiculous things to keep up the facade.

Being able to appropriately handle this kind of criticism or disagreement is a basic requirement for doing any kind of organizing with communists, so I hope you can do some introspection if this is how you act with others in real places.

Please note to yourself that I am very patient, far more than most people, and this is why I continued replying and giving you opportunities to make corrections or move forward. Most people will not give you this grace. They will dismiss you and avoid you, get you moved off of their team, or fire you if you respond this way to technical feedback and disagreement.

With that said, I won't be replying further, comrade.