6
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)
PC Master Race
18419 readers
5 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.
Notes:
- PCMR Community Name - Our Response and the Survey
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Wait wait wait.
....what?
Like, I am not surprised that somebody would do a takedown strike on that.
But... what?
Does... the video contain substantial segments of Bloomberg video within it?
Was a long vid, I don't remember it all, but it uh, seemed like entirely self shot footage to me.
And obviously even if it did contain a snippet from a Bloomberg video... this would surely count as 'substantially transformative' content.
But also... Bloomberg is Bloomberg, they have a lot of money and high powered lawyers.
Well, congrats Steve, you and the team are officially real journalists now.
They site Bloomberg a couple of times, I wouldn't be surprised if that was why because the sited articles are pay to view, which is a completely absurd reason but nothing surprises me with corps these days
Pssst, in this context, it's "cite"
So youtube videos cant come from published sources now? I doubt he read an entire paywalled article, start to finish, on video. Even if screenshots of paragraphs are used, thats just citing sources and corroborating the things coming out of your mouth. This is an extremely dangerous precedent.
Keep in mind that Nvidia et all are directly collaborating with the white house, and reporting on this stuff is going against the official narrative