70
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14378 readers
498 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I have definitely wondered abot the tradeoff between pulling it out as a downpayment for a house and taking the loss but not renting vs leaving it for compound growth. It doesn't matter at the moment since it is not enough to be practical but the conventional advice is that you always lose by doing this and I'm not sure I believe that is still true, though I haven't actually tried to work it out.
There's also the, not insignificant, chance that the dollar won't have any value in something like 20 years.
There are some exceptions that allow penalty free withdrawals but the dollar limits are quite low.
https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/retirement-topics-exceptions-to-tax-on-early-distributions
"qualified first-time homebuyers, up to $10,000"
lol,
You'd probably need over $200k in your retirement account (depending on your housing costs and apy) for it to be more cost effective to leave it in there and even then you're still pissing thousands of dollars away a year in rent instead of owning property. It's almost certainly better to buy rather than rent in this housing market.
There's the combination of not paying rent and then the two questions of "will housing as a speculative asset outpace my 401k" and "can you retire without owning a house and if not is it better to secure the house and figure out the daily expenses later". I do consider these mostly theoretical questions