152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I did not defend Nazi apologia. I did defend Zenz on his opinions about the genocide against Uyghurs in China.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

His opinions about the "genocide"? The fact that you recognise that they are entirely opinions and not facts just shows how inauthentic the claims are.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Not his. Theirs. The opinion of the majority of the WaPo team.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

That's not what "I did defend Zenz on his opinions" means at all. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you'll lie about what you said only a few centimetres away?

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Who gives a shit about some dudes opinions about the misinformation he's spreading?

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Apparently both the WaPo and I do.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Neat! I personally give a shit about facts rather than what some dumbass loser thinks might be happening despite all evidence to the contrary. The Washington Post is a rag owned by Jeff Bezos, acting like it is in any way reputable is laughable

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I didn't defend nazi apologia, I just defended nazi apologia.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13446 readers
698 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS