152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I did not defend Nazi apologia. I did defend Zenz on his opinions about the genocide against Uyghurs in China.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago

His opinions about the "genocide"? The fact that you recognise that they are entirely opinions and not facts just shows how inauthentic the claims are.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Not his. Theirs. The opinion of the majority of the WaPo team.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

That's not what "I did defend Zenz on his opinions" means at all. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you'll lie about what you said only a few centimetres away?

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Who gives a shit about some dudes opinions about the misinformation he's spreading?

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Apparently both the WaPo and I do.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Neat! I personally give a shit about facts rather than what some dumbass loser thinks might be happening despite all evidence to the contrary. The Washington Post is a rag owned by Jeff Bezos, acting like it is in any way reputable is laughable

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago

I didn't defend nazi apologia, I just defended nazi apologia.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13690 readers
268 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS