43
submitted 3 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] memfree@beehaw.org 15 points 3 months ago

The process through which I was placed on TPUSA’s list was anathema to public debate. Instead of writing an op-ed in response to my New York Times op-ed, or inviting me to a public debate on these issues, TPUSA instead added me to an online list that is — as I explained in another New York Times op-ed back in 2016 — essentially a new species of McCarthyism.

Maybe we didn't realize the extent back then, buy by now I think we all know the playbook for a speaker to accuse their opposition of the speaker's offenses.

In this case, it is easy to check that, yes, Kirk SAYS he's for debate, but we can check records to see there are no Kirk/Yancy debates, yet there is a TPUSA list (rather than give them hits, here's an old archive page).

Trump and his sycophants are implementing political repression, censorship, and politically targeting free speech, which means that those of us who believe in democratic speech, in dissent, in open and critical debate, are being targeted, are being silenced, are being marked for further violence. This is not new for Trump.

Again, we just saw the FCC threaten ABC over Kimmel, and Trump himself has opined that criticizing him should be illegal and networks should be punished for allowing it. They just sent troops to Portland to stop demonstrators?!? That's not a free democracy! That's ~~Fmmhmph~~[CENSORED]

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

Politics

11104 readers
143 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS