658
Runes (slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The latin source word is much older than 1500s, but the question is whether they understand what it's about.

Both the 15th century "radiacion" and the latin "radiationem" are about emitting light and are synonymous with "to shine" or "to glow" (though without the heat connotation).

None of that conveys the sense of danger and fear of death that the modern word "radiation" means.

Kinda like how the word "plane" was in use in English in the 1600s and derives from the much older Latin word "planum", but if I'd tell some from 1600s England or from ancient Rome that I took a plane/planum to another country, they'd be utterly confused about what that means.

The word is the same (or at least very similar), but the concept is unknown.

So you need to find a concept that's similar to what you want to convey, and then use the fitting word.

For example, someone from the 1600s might understand the term "flying machine" (which was a well-known word in use in research and "science fiction" at that time).

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, they don't convey the sense of danger, I agree.

But "light-emitter" would be worse than "it radiates death/evil", imho

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You think?

A light emitter could be quite useful. If I am in a low-tech society, having a device or material that would emit light in the dark could be pretty desirable.

It might confuse me though, because that "light emitter" doesn't actually emit any light at all. Maybe this ancient society was full of liers or maybe their devices are all expired and broken. Probably their warnings aren't worth anything either.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
658 points (99.7% liked)

RPGMemes

13814 readers
1136 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS