160
Google's dev registration plan will end the F-Droid project
(www.theregister.com)
F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform. The client makes it easy to browse, install, and keep track of updates on your device.
Matrix space | forum | IRC
We shut really get a go fund me or something alike to sue google over its anti competitive behavior. Imagine if a small portion of people would donate and most devs will join in. We might stand a very small change to do something...
Fdroid are:
So I think these are preferred avenues of action right now.
Did you see how difficult it was for "Stop Killing Games" to get momentum and be considered by regulators? And that was arguing for products you've already paid for.
Google will argue "security concerns" and point at Apple's practices and easily get a free pass from regulators.
There needs to be an alternative to Android and Apple. Money may be better spent on funding non-Pixel hardware that can use Graphene.
The EU got Apple to open up sideloading. Why would they not stop Google from suddenly doing the same?
Graphene's team is already in communications with an Android OEM, fortunately.
But the thing is that they are not really making Android more secure with this policy.
They are still allowing APKs signed with debug keys to work.. so the only alternative now for any developer that doesn't want to register with Google is gonna be using those debug credentials to sign their app releases.
This is not gonna stop rogue APKs from outside Google’s store, it’s just gonna make them less secure (since they'll have to rely on debug keys, which is essentially equivalent to being unsigned, from a security point of view).
This is not gonna stop alternative stores either, in fact, it will make it more important to use stores, since they might still be able to to implement alternative ways to check package authenticity before installing, even when using debug keys.
The issue with using debug keys is that you are now not gonna be able to shield apps signed this way from getting replaced by illegitimate malware you might download from outside the store. So overall, this move is making Android LESS secure, not more.
None of that logic matters man. Regulators don't understand this shit. Do you think the UK's online age restrictions make anyone safer? It's all bullshit for their own purposes.
Maybe see if the EFF has something in the works and domate to them
Maybe get the EU involved.
or just start a campaign that costs nothing: a petition to each local politician, one to the agency that regulates anti-trust, anti-monopoly stuff. I'm kind of shocked that China hasn't sold us phones and apps that bypass some of thee American or western things we hate so much. It would seem China would encourage western dissent.