160
submitted 6 days ago by zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml to c/fdroid@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We shut really get a go fund me or something alike to sue google over its anti competitive behavior. Imagine if a small portion of people would donate and most devs will join in. We might stand a very small change to do something...

[-] IanTwenty@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Fdroid are:

appealing to regulators and competition authorities to scrutinize Google's proposals, and for developers and users to put pressure on politicians.

So I think these are preferred avenues of action right now.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 11 points 6 days ago

Did you see how difficult it was for "Stop Killing Games" to get momentum and be considered by regulators? And that was arguing for products you've already paid for.

Google will argue "security concerns" and point at Apple's practices and easily get a free pass from regulators.

There needs to be an alternative to Android and Apple. Money may be better spent on funding non-Pixel hardware that can use Graphene.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

The EU got Apple to open up sideloading. Why would they not stop Google from suddenly doing the same?

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Graphene's team is already in communications with an Android OEM, fortunately.

[-] Ferk@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

But the thing is that they are not really making Android more secure with this policy.

They are still allowing APKs signed with debug keys to work.. so the only alternative now for any developer that doesn't want to register with Google is gonna be using those debug credentials to sign their app releases.

This is not gonna stop rogue APKs from outside Google’s store, it’s just gonna make them less secure (since they'll have to rely on debug keys, which is essentially equivalent to being unsigned, from a security point of view).

This is not gonna stop alternative stores either, in fact, it will make it more important to use stores, since they might still be able to to implement alternative ways to check package authenticity before installing, even when using debug keys.

The issue with using debug keys is that you are now not gonna be able to shield apps signed this way from getting replaced by illegitimate malware you might download from outside the store. So overall, this move is making Android LESS secure, not more.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 3 points 5 days ago

None of that logic matters man. Regulators don't understand this shit. Do you think the UK's online age restrictions make anyone safer? It's all bullshit for their own purposes.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

Maybe see if the EFF has something in the works and domate to them

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

Maybe get the EU involved.

[-] GenkiFeral@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

or just start a campaign that costs nothing: a petition to each local politician, one to the agency that regulates anti-trust, anti-monopoly stuff. I'm kind of shocked that China hasn't sold us phones and apps that bypass some of thee American or western things we hate so much. It would seem China would encourage western dissent.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
160 points (99.4% liked)

F-Droid

9687 readers
43 users here now

F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform. The client makes it easy to browse, install, and keep track of updates on your device.

Website | GitLab | Mastodon

Matrix space | forum | IRC

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS