I don't care about outreach in this case. This is a vegan comm where a vegan is asking a question to other vegans and yet this carnist thinks he gets to have an opinion? I mean look at this idiot:

milk and honey for example, are not vegan, despite it not necessarily doing physical pain and suffering to the animal.

No clue but yapping anyway. This is a problem with the predominantly white carnist cis men in this app who think they can just come and go into any space at any time as they please because that's how it's been for them their whole life. They think that they can Just Ask Questions and others are obliged to debate them in a polite and restrained manner so that they may "educate themselves" or whatever. It's not just a problem in vegan comms, but in female only comms, trans comms etc. And if they aren't shown the door in a resolute manner they will return with their uninformed, braindead opinions instead of shutting up and reading before writing.

Edit: what really ticked me off is this notion of "ally to vegans" as it completely deplatforms the animals. It's not just congratulatory to the vegan as if they're being extraordinarily virtuous and denying themselves a luxury like some ascetic, but self congratulary as if some of that virtuosity might be bestowed upon the carnist excusing their "transgressions" by "allying" with the vegans. As if not wanting to kill, maim or otherwise subjugate thinking, feeling creatures is a good deed and not just the absence of evil. Being a vegan does not make you good, but not being a vegan makes you evil.