139
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] scytale@piefed.zip 32 points 2 days ago

The MIDI protocal. The technologies that use it have evolved in all sorts of ways, but the protocol has remained unchanged.

[-] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago

MIDI protocol for users might be good enough but for developers is a nightmare if you want to do advanced synthesis

[-] Coopr8@kbin.earth 19 points 2 days ago

MPE and MIDI 2.0 would like a word zir

[-] scytale@piefed.zip 15 points 2 days ago

That’s fair. But the fact that MIDI 1.0 isn’t going away anytime soon shows how good it was from conception. From Sweetwater:

Because MIDI 2.0 coexists well with MIDI 1.0, it’s likely MIDI 1.0 devices will continue to be produced in the future if MIDI 2.0’s features are not needed for a particular application. In developing MIDI 2.0, backward compatibility with MIDI 1.0 was always a priority.

MIDI 2.0 is not about replacing the original specification but about adding features that enhance the spec with features users have wanted almost since MIDI 1.0 appeared.

[-] Coopr8@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago

The best inventions do progress with backwards compatibility

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)

Asklemmy

50850 readers
792 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS