364
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Yes, he has a responsibility to both side a conflict as a diplomat trying to maintain influence with Israel, the side that has all the power.

Civilians are always hostages. It'd be more reasonable to call the Palestinians being held hostages than to call the Israeli hostages "prisoners of war". There's also clearly more of a delineation between the IDF and the Israeli civilians than there is in the Gaza populace and the "fighters". Partly because Israelis are the aggressors, of course.

He can't be a person who just rages on social media about it if he wants the best outcome.

You can definitely argue that this is caving to Israel. He's literally being the definition of the word "diplomatic".

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

In the presence of genocide I believe he can be judged by a more absolute moral barometer, regardless of his role or designation.

How does history reflect on those that remained silent during the Holocaust or Armenian genocide?

Obama seeks to put himself in that group with his assessment here.

He's not a diplomat. He's a guy that has been paid at least tens of millions by israel.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
364 points (93.1% liked)

Palestine

2145 readers
449 users here now

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

  1. Posts can be in Arabic or English.

  2. Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS