362
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 day ago

Well of course Palestinians don't have families. The Israelis have killed most of them.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

deliberately too. they specifically murder family members in front of others. they're the worst, most vicious terrorists in recent memory.

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Well duh. To be effective, terror demands an audience.

[-] fellagha@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 day ago

Fuck that war criminal, and fuck the ruling class he served that still exists today

Its Obama, what do you expect from that war criminal?

[-] robador51@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I take it as the families of Israelis affected by the events of 7 October, and the entirety of the ~~Palestinian~~ Gazan people. How this is dehumanizing language is beyond me tbh.

[-] Dreamer@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

Analyzing the bias in BBC reporting in Palestine

Coverage of Gaza War in the New York Times and Other Major Newspapers Heavily Favored Israel, Analysis Shows

Western coverage of Gaza: A textbook case of coloniser’s journalism

If you want more on Bias. Also, let's make one thing clear: This isn't a genocide against the Gazan people, it's a genocide against the Palestinian people. Gazans are Palestinians in diaspora. Israel has been working nonstop to ethnically cleanse all Palestinians in Palestine whether that's in Gaza, West Bank, or the rest of the occupied territories. Anyone acting like it's just Gaza or the "Gazans" is part of the problem. It might seem pendantic, but it's too late for some half-assed lip service bullshit, especially from those that have been complicit, enablers, and the primary drivers of this genocide and oppression 100 years in the making.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Palestinians have families, and not only Palestinians in Gaza were harmed by the genocide and ethnic cleansing. There were also pogroms in the West Bank. Obama is bothsiding a genocide as if there is any equivalency between the victim and the aggressor.

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 10 points 21 hours ago

This tweet is best understood in the context of the consistently biased media coverage that we've seen over the last few years, in which Israeli deaths and injuries are covered far more frequently and with more emotive language than those of Palestinians. This is despite the fact that the harm to Palestinians is far larger, both in terms of the brutality inflicted upon civilians, and the scale of deaths. This is a genocide.

And yes, I'm using the word "Palestinian", because besides the fact that Palestinians in the West Bank have also been severely affected by this conflict (as well as being systematically oppressed by the apartheid regime even before October 7th), Israeli politicians have made it abundantly clear that complete genocide of Palestinians in their goal.

[-] ideonek@piefed.social 31 points 1 day ago

Wait, wait... Palestinians are mentioned! When he talks about... shared responsibilities. Never mind, go on.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 day ago

Obama is a war criminal and just another cog in the machine

[-] DropBear@theblower.au 39 points 1 day ago

"Let’s take his statement apart line by line because every sentence in that post was a masterclass in how empire speaks empathy while protecting itself."
https://drstaceypatton1865.substack.com/p/the-elegance-of-empire-how-barack
@palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com

#Gaza
#CrimesAgainstHumanity
#genocide
#hasbara

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 points 21 hours ago

Thanks for this link. It's good analysis. I found the tweet so viscerally offensive that I struggled to articulate the specifics of how it was so fucked, so I appreciate seeing someone break it down.

[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Obama is evil!

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

Oh man. I'm pretty sure "genocide studies" classes aren't going to be talking about Obama.

Bothsidesing indeed.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yes, he has a responsibility to both side a conflict as a diplomat trying to maintain influence with Israel, the side that has all the power.

Civilians are always hostages. It'd be more reasonable to call the Palestinians being held hostages than to call the Israeli hostages "prisoners of war". There's also clearly more of a delineation between the IDF and the Israeli civilians than there is in the Gaza populace and the "fighters". Partly because Israelis are the aggressors, of course.

He can't be a person who just rages on social media about it if he wants the best outcome.

You can definitely argue that this is caving to Israel. He's literally being the definition of the word "diplomatic".

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

In the presence of genocide I believe he can be judged by a more absolute moral barometer, regardless of his role or designation.

How does history reflect on those that remained silent during the Holocaust or Armenian genocide?

Obama seeks to put himself in that group with his assessment here.

He's not a diplomat. He's a guy that has been paid at least tens of millions by israel.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
362 points (93.1% liked)

Palestine

2145 readers
836 users here now

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

  1. Posts can be in Arabic or English.

  2. Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS