71
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by CubitOom@infosec.pub to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

@jordanlund@lemmy.world just removed my post from !politics@lemmy.world because the linked article wasn't a "news" source.

The sidebar makes no mention of accepted news sources. And honestly, fuck that fascist nonsense. How the fuck can it be justified to remove posts from articles made by fucking non-profits?

I guess @jordanlund@lemmy.world is also saying that since they disagree with the premise of the article, it should be removed.

People need to be aware that !politics@lemmy.world should be avoided.

This is why I also posted the same thing to !usa@midwest.social

Trump is openly committing treason. He must be impeached and removed from office.

https://midwest.social/post/36857540

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ech@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There's absolutely zero requirement for posts to be news in the sidebar, let alone a definition of what they consider "valid" news sources. In fact, everything there directly supports posts like this.

First line of the sidebar?

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Yup, certainly fits. Next to the rules.

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

"Article" is not a word solely for newsprint or journalism. If that's their intent, they need to say so and explicitly define what qualifies as "news" (problematic on its own, but for another discussion).

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.

Aside from the nebulous and subjective requirement for "quality", nothing here specifies "news only" either or disqualifies the OP post.

The rest of the rules just cover behavior and general tos. So, if anything, an original article discussing US politics in the "discuss US politics" community should be welcomed by any mod acting in good faith.

[-] btaf45@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

sidebar?

Look at this bullshit on the sidebar.

[ some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.]

This means: JL can and frequently does totally ignore his own rules and censors and bans people without any justification. Because you have an opinion that he does not like or is slightly to the right or left of his opinions or he is just too ignorant to understand what you are saying.

That means there are tons of unwritten rules on stuff he mods. It means he is just as bad if not worse than the worst mods on reddit are. There is no reason for anyone to post to anything this guy mods.

Well everyone knows Jordan Lund doesn't act in good faith, so you shouldn't go on !politics@lemmy.world expecting good faith moderation. If you want clear rules and fair leadership, make your own community.

/s

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
71 points (76.7% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1513 readers
19 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS