[-] ech@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 hours ago

It looks like his post is on threads? Not that that's really better, but it is a different kind of bad.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 8 points 23 hours ago

I just remembered this review I ran across years ago for "audio rocks". Audiophiles are a strange bunch.

http://www.adventuresinhifiaudio.com/26/01/2018/audiophile-rocks-down-the-rabbit-hole-once-again/

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Mech-toparasite

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I missed the news about a sequel and was popping off when this showed up. Hoping it's not as resource hungry as AW2 was, but excited either way. Control was amazing.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Super Bombad Racing is the only true Star Wars racing game (/s). But for real, this looks cool. Curious what the gameplay looks like.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 76 points 2 weeks ago

Or 150 TB, for the correct way to write it.

10
submitted 1 month ago by ech@lemmy.ca to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

So I'm slowly learning how to us yt-dlp and I'm trying to set up a default command to check a number of channels for new videos. Currently I have it set to download the first 10 new vids of each channel, and to skip anything past a certain date, but it takes a while to get to the date information I guess, which adds unnecessary time and checks, especially for channels that don't have any vids that are new enough.

What I'd like it to do is skip the rest of the channel if it encounters a video that was published outside the given date range, but I'm not finding anything so far. Does this functionality exist? Or am I just out of luck?

My current command looks like this:

yt-dlp -t sleep -I1-10 --dateafter 20251031 --sponsorblock-remove sponsor --format "bestvideo*[filesize<3G]+bestaudio/best" --concurrent-fragments 25 --force-write-archive -o '%(uploader)s-%(upload_date)s-%(title)s [%(id)s].%(ext)s' --download-archive "archive.md" --batch-file "subscriptions.md"

16
submitted 2 months ago by ech@lemmy.ca to c/gaming@beehaw.org

I generally look forward to these little demo fests. While it's never exactly been a flood of mind blowing games, I usually find a handful of upcoming games that stand out and show some promise. This time around, though, I'm left dispirited by all the slop flooding the lists. Generated slop. Asset-flip slop. The few games that aren't I only find after wading through pages upon pages of rubbish, and then it's a crapshoot on if it seems worth downloading. I eventually gave up and don't have much interest in trying again.

I've long been a fan and supporter of the indie scene, understanding that the diamonds that make it worth it take effort to find. But if this is what we have to look forward to, I'm concerned how it'll fare as the requisite effort to sift through the dregs grows exponentially. Eventually it's just too much.

3
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ech@lemmy.ca to c/ublockorigin@lemmy.ml

Currently, I have some filters set up through uBlock to make my Lemmy browsing more tolerable. For keywords, I copied some scripts that look like this, with one line and each word separated by a vertical bar: lemmy.ca##article.row:has-text(/keyword|keyword|keyword|etc/i)

But the url filters I use only seem to work if they are separated into individual lines, e.g.: lemmy.ca##div.post-listing:has([href*="url/"])

lemmy.ca##div.post-listing:has([href*="url/"])

I was wondering if it's possible to condense the url lines to make it a bit more manageable in the same way the keyword filter is.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 93 points 3 months ago

That's for when it's "art". When the message goes against the mandated mission, they call it "vandalism".

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 130 points 3 months ago

Are you suggesting that's not part of game development?

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 114 points 3 months ago

*3 people (used to be 4). Not that that's less impressive. It's just worth it to be accurate.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 90 points 4 months ago

Ooohhh, so that's what "vibe coding" is.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 60 points 4 months ago

The woman's skin fused together, and her initial claim was only to cover medical expenses. MDs faafo in court and she was then awarded further damages. The PR blitz to paint her as unreasonable and "sue happy" was just vindictive in their part, and unfortunately effective.

192

I downvoted maybe 3 posts for being "unwise", but I guess that's not allowed. Looked up the mod and they banned a wave of people, all for "...". Good stuff.

This "banned for using the functions of the website" shit is really getting out of hand. Unless it's unequivocal support for every post, you're out. It's ridiculous out here.

Also! We still can't block communities we've been banned from? Wtf?

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 106 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hey now, he earned those fair and square off the corpses he killed.

view more: next ›

ech

joined 5 months ago