405

What would be some fact that, while true, could be told in a context or way that is misinfomating or make the other person draw incorrect conclusions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Centrifugal force does not exist

[-] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 year ago

"A laughable claim, Mister Bond, perpetuated by overzealous teachers of science. Simply construct Newton's laws into a rotating system and you will see a centrifugal force term appear as plain as day." https://xkcd.com/123/

Do you seriously expect me to do this while strapped to a centrifuge?

[-] bobthened@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

It does, it’s just called a different thing. Centripetal force is exactly the same thing as what most people assume centrifugal force means.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know I've had it explained a million times to me since I was a kid but... I still can't remember the difference between the two. I do, however, remember this little factoid about it.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think centripetal force is whatever is pushing/pulling the object toward the center of rotation, such as the closed door of a car pushing on you while driving around a curve, where otherwise you would fly out of the car. Another example is the wheels of the car causing it to travel on a curve instead of straight. Or the rope of a tetherball for a pulling example.

In most cases (besides orbits in space) the force is question is actually the electromagnetic force, like any other case where objects made of atoms touch.

Personally I think it's weird to call that a specific force, especially by those who don't want to give centrifugal force a name - sure it's really just things "tending" to travel straight instead of following the curve, but no reason that can't have a special name, it's certainly intuitive enough.

[-] Cyna@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

It doesn't exist in an inertial frame of reference. In a non-inertial frame it's a perfectly valid force

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
405 points (95.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43822 readers
867 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS