178
AWS outage reminds us why $2,449 Internet-dependent beds are a bad idea
(arstechnica.com)
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
And how did no one think about a fallback in case of a outage? I bet some of the tech people thought about it and management said: "No, we don't want the consumers to have a functioning unit without internet access. We need the data!".
Btw. same with the new Windows 11 setup. There's no technical reason for a computer without internet access to deny the installation.
Surely it doesn't do this when your internet drops out, right? RIGHT??
Weirdly enough, most companies collecting your data are actually really bad at doing so. Business people don't prioritize data at all, and data collection is a total afterthought, often treated as a major inconvenience. It costs money, and they can't charge for it.
The reason why there was no fallback is because that would have cost money to implement, and they can't imagine someone wanting to use their product that way.