860
submitted 2 months ago by als@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

I imagine they'd be aware of it if YouTube just suddenly stopped working

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Man, I loved that line about how they could shut down three Amazon projects with a single email. That small bit of leverage against these parasites is all they have.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They couldn't just make YouTube suddenly stop working.

ffmpeg is published under the LGPL license, meaning that all of the published versions are free for anyone to use in anything, as long as they don't modify the ffmpeg library.

The only leverage they have over YouTube is that they could stop allowing YouTube to use future versions. That could create headaches for YouTube if it turns out there's major security issues, since then YouTube will need to either solve them with a wrapper / sandbox around the library, or write their own library, but any existing versions in use will always be usable by YouTube.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
  1. Create major security issues on purpose
  2. Release and wait for them to update
  3. Switch licenses and release fixes
  4. Publish vulnerabilities far and wide
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
860 points (99.4% liked)

Open Source

43984 readers
373 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS