858
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 302 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 116 points 3 weeks ago

Its insane just how important it is and the vast majority of the world doesn't even know it exists. Truly unsung heroes (everyone who works on it).

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 weeks ago

I'm surprised nobody posted the xkcd comic. I think Randall had ImageMagick in mind (he names it in the alt text) but it applies to ffmpeg as well.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago

I always used to think about curl when I see that comic. Maybe less important in recent years but still a corner stone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 66 points 3 weeks ago

Ffmpeg has been such cool software to learn. Simple filter chains can do incredible things

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago
[-] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 36 points 3 weeks ago

Well for instance you can use it to apply tranparencys or other effects using the geq filter. It applies a formula to every pixel in the input and can adjust alpha, rgb values, and gamma. You can also use conditionals in your formula and have access to the current pixels location and value, so you can apply your transforms only to specific regions if you want, or do an adjustment keyed only to a specific color.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] vodka@feddit.org 176 points 3 weeks ago

Could be worse, at least Google isn't opening tickets as high priority asking basic questions on how to use ffmpeg.

Unlike the Microsoft teams devs: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10341 Really funny to go "this is a high priority ticket" as if they've paid to use ffmpeg in teams.

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 105 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 weeks ago

I presume that's not actually Elon Musk in the replies...

[-] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 weeks ago

That is actually Fellon Flask!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 weeks ago

Jesus christ lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 143 points 3 weeks ago

The fucking gas lighting in this response

Google provides more assistance to open source software projects than almost any other organization, and these debates are more likely to drive away potential sponsors than to attract them

"We ran AI that may or may not have found a legitimate issue, and you're not looking into it for us fast enough. That's going to drive away new volunteers that we need"

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 100 points 3 weeks ago

Google is trying to kill Android and take control of it, I wonder if such acts aren't part of the same agenda.

[-] irish_link@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

?

I must know as much as I thought.

I thought they owned Android. Is that not true?

[-] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 70 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-android-development-aosp-3538503/
https://www.androidauthority.com/google-sideloading-android-developer-verification-rules-3602811/

ps: Have no doubt, every claim Google makes about restricting stuff for your own good is just them lying out of their asses.

So I guess more free open source projects won’t be able to be maintained by overworked volunteers, and they’ll get "rescued" by trillion-dollar corporations that will close-source everything, backdoor the shit out of it, and decide what you can and cannot have.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 weeks ago

They do, but Android is open source, and now Google is trying to close it down.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 80 points 3 weeks ago

If I had an open source program that is being used by fuckers like Google, who can afford to pay but don't, and then come in and demand shit. I'd just ignore them and pretend they don't exist and continue with my life. Let them bark until they're blue in the face. But first I'd put this as the first line in the README.md “if you're a big corporation and need help, come with money. Otherwise, please don't bother me”.

[-] phx@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago

Not only that they have the money, but Google is actively working to lock down their streaming platform (YouTube) against third-parties and they have basically yanked the rug for their OS platform, while adding requirements for developers to sideload.

Their entire direction is antagonistic and in opposition to the core concepts of FOSS

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ignirtoq@feddit.online 39 points 3 weeks ago

The problem is that some small but non-zero fraction of these bugs may be exploitable security flaws with the software, and these bug reports are on the open internet. So if they just ignore them all, they risk overlooking a genuine vulnerability that a bad actor can then more easily find and use. Then the FOSS project gets the blame, because the bug report was there, they should have fixed it!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 80 points 3 weeks ago

FFmpeg has every right to ask this. Google can't expect to extract free labour from the community.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] capuccino@lemmy.world 70 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 63 points 3 weeks ago

Greedy tech should pay. No question about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 59 points 3 weeks ago

All these company execs know is exploitation, and it's hilarious to see how immature they act when they don't get their way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] communism@lemmy.ml 57 points 3 weeks ago

Surely Google has the resources to fix the bugs themselves. Most FOSS projects probably appreciate code contributions more than money.

[-] chrash0@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

there are some teams in companies like this where management doesn’t want to account for upstreaming and some engineers are happy to open a bug report, move the ticket to blocked, and move on to something else

[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

this would probably just lead to the corporation taking more and more of a role until they take over development of the FOSS projects they care about, which is a particular nightmare I would prefer to avoid

was upset enough when Microsoft bought Github

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] qqq@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

I can't say I've ever sent a security related bug report without at least some work done trying to understand how to fix it. Surely the caliber of people working for Project Zero can do that too, otherwise hi Google I'll take one job please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 55 points 3 weeks ago

They're profiting from FOSS, nobody is trying to prevent them from doing so, but they refuse to spend small amounts of money helping out part-time coders ... and you know why. That money is going to the mid-level managers themselves.

Do the right thing and help your company in the medium run, or pocket chump change? Yeah, easy answer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 44 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That was an incredibly interesting read, and I learned a lot! Thank you for posting it!

It’s genuinely infuriating that so much labor is simply stolen, in so many different ways, from people with a passion for what they do, and turned into profit for some mega corp, with the vast majority funneled to a few people completely unrelated to ~~the~~ any work.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, bugs are bugs. It's not like Google makes them they are there. It's up to ffmpeg to decide if they shoul care or not

But in general I think companies who rely on opensource need to contribute more.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, bugs are bugs. It's not like Google makes them they are there.

No but there are big bugs and small bugs and it sound like Google's AI bug finder is flooding them with small bugs that don't effect the security or end product so much. But some unpaid volunteer from FFMpeg has to check them all out regardless. And Google getting pissy about it doesn't help.

[-] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

The bug in this case was a vulnerability in 1995's rebel assault 2 video game cinematic, specifically the first 20 frames. So only people with that game, watching the specific cinematic, who got the special hobby build of ffmpeg, had this vulnerability.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anzo@programming.dev 32 points 3 weeks ago

"Allow me to interject and explain the four liberties..." (Or, goto fsfe.org/freesoftware )

If I understand correctly the biggest issue for FFMPEG and other projects is not only the Google and Microsoft that use them without giving back, but their chosen License. They gave permission to corporations to do this. One of the potential ways to fix this situation, is to change the license. For example from LGPL to AGPL. And then they can sell the legalese package of allowing them to break their license. The biggest difficulty is that, as a project, they'd need consent from every past and future contributors. So, yeah. I get it. This is a mess.

It would be way more easier if more corporations donated to open source projects... There's too much labour that's invisible

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

They should just call this an incomplete AI output. If the AI is so good, it should create the fix, add tests, and ensure nothing else breaks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

“The position of the FFmpeg X account is that somehow disclosing vulnerabilities is a bad thing. Google provides more assistance to open source software projects than almost any other organization, and these debates are more likely to drive away potential sponsors than to attract them.”

Yeah slave, stop complaining get your ass back to work because I'm about to dump more obligatory work on your lap that you will fix for no pay, I don't care you have a family to feed!

Your complaining about not having any sponsor for the free work that we sell for millions of dollars may cause that you don't get any sponsors!

The entitlement and mental gymnastics here at display is insane

Google has made billions off of open source software they got and used for free. Sure, they gave back a few fractions of a penny for each million they made with it, they gave back with adding some softwares here and there when it strategically suited them, but the simple fact is that without open source software, Google wouldn't exist today, definitely not the way they do now.

Hell, the internet wouldn't exist as it does today, it would be a tiny fraction of what it is today without open source software. Open source software is amazing yet most people in the world don't even know that it exists, that it's a concept, and that people are doing this

Yet there are countless companies profiting majorly from the work of others without giving back a dime. There are multinationals that profit in the billions from open source software without giving back properly or at all.

We need an updated GPL amendment or something that requires companies to start giving back productively in some form or another once they start majorly profiting from the work of open source projects.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"This library comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY"

- "But the 1995 rebel assault build tho."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
858 points (99.4% liked)

Open Source

42446 readers
240 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS