335
submitted 2 months ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

The science ones are generally legitimate. The literature and peace prizes have been wholly co-opted by western interests. The economics prize isn’t even a real Nobel, it’s just a prize sponsored by the Swedish central bank and administered by the Nobel Institute, and it’s a pure PR tool for legitimizing neoliberalism.

[-] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 months ago

The science Nobel prizes are outrageously misogynist. In the last few years, they are finally giving it to actual female scientist because they can no longer suppress women researchers without facing a single criticism, unlike the past. Cecilia Payne, Chien-Shiung Wu, Vera Rubin got treated like shit.

[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

By "generally legitimate" I just mean that they're awarded to scientists for real things, as opposed to, like, giving the medical prize to RFK Jr. It's still a shit institution.

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

Right and even the guy it’s named after tho. Kind of a piece of shit.

[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Most things are named after pieces of shit. Being a piece of shit is the number one way to get something named after you. That's not to say the Nobels aren't a sham, but conceptually there are more offensive things than a prize that's supposed to go to someone who contributes to humanity. Impressive that the system so effectively coopted them to do more shitty things. Important lesson there.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
335 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38939 readers
393 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS