1224
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago
[-] Eq0@literature.cafe 34 points 1 month ago

Wow! I’m quite annoyed that it was fixed by restoring the previous package while the author had explicitly deleted it. That seems contrary to the laymen interpretation of code ownership

[-] Mika@piefed.ca 25 points 1 month ago

npm is a bunch of cucks. Folded to the lawyer threats immediately but ignored the authors wish to remove his work off platform, and made sure it's no longer possible?

I have to remember never to use them to share my code. God bless I'm not a node dev.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I love how the NPM CEO gave him the tool/command to remove all his work from the platform. What a dummy.

I also support the idea that he should be allowed to remove his work. It should have been republished according to the license. With a forked new name. IMO. But I know what a nightmare that would be.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
1224 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

28398 readers
1020 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS