952
200,000 users abandon Netflix after crackdown backfires
(www.forbes.com.au)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Making it accessible in more countries must've had absolutely nothing to do with it. Zilch, nada, nothing. It was all about cracking down on password sharing. /s
But the thing is it actually did work, Netflix has seen a boost in revenue and the companies stock price.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/netflix-stock-jumps-as-analysts-see-password-crackdown-ad-tier-boosting-growth/ar-AA1fFSlp
Netflix can't implement three different changes to its business model and then cherry pick one of those changes as the reason for the increased revenue. Well, maybe not can't... They're certainly trying to, and some folk are eating it up, apparently.
If the tire is flat on my car, and I:
... I shouldn't go around telling folk God fixed my flat tire.
Cool, but that analogy doesn't work with how companies are valued.
The only thing that matters to the stock market is growth. It doesn't matter how you get there (most of the time), as long as you're posting positive numbers and your outlook looks good.
That's not the argument you were making.
Ah, my apologies... You're not the original commenter. Point still stands, though... It's not the argument the original commenter put forth.
Bro it's not a guessing game they release this information in thier quarterly financial statements....
https://ir.netflix.net/financials/quarterly-earnings/default.aspx
Feeling a bit like a broken record. Alrighty, bro... You explain to me what metrics Netflix is using to differentiate the impact their password sharing policy changes made opposed to the other changes they made. I read over their documentation, and didn't see it.
You could be right and seem to be implying the new territories are the main reason but do you have a source for those metrics? You've been calling into question how Netflix is counting this so which counts are you using?