317
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bobman@unilem.org 7 points 1 year ago

What if they don't have the power to topple their oppressors without foreign intervention?

It seems that's the case for Iran.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I agree. A revolution would be a violent and bloody one. I worry it would still be ineffective. Conservatism is like cancer. The treatment is deadly for both the disease and its victim.

[-] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Foreign infervention is almost always the worst possible option.

It only makes sense in the case of active mass genocides (think WWII, Cambodia or Serbia). Toppling an oppresive but stable regime through foreign power always ends in destabilisation and even more suffering to the people.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Foreign infervention is almost always the worst possible option.

Agreed.

Anyone who suggests otherwise needs to look at the very long history of foreign attempts at "intervention" in Afghanistan.

The country was left worse than it was after each of those many failed attempts.

[-] JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Serbia? Serbia (SR Yugoslavia) did a lot of nasty shit, but 99' intervention was not a product of a genocide, let alone a massive one.

UN ruling in question, BBC article.

Crimes against humanity and war crimes did take place, it said, but "the exactions committed by Milosevic's regime cannot be qualified as criminal acts of genocide, since their purpose was not the destruction of the Albanian ethnic group... but its forceful departure from Kosovo".

Srebreica was a genocide, but was not perpotrated by actual Serbia, if it makes any difference...

[-] bobman@unilem.org -3 points 1 year ago

Right.

Let me know when these problems get solved doing something I don't suggest.

[-] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

...wasn't foreign intervention the primary reason why Iran is in this mess in the first place?

[-] bobman@unilem.org 0 points 1 year ago

That means it's impossible to intervene with positive results.

Is that what you're implying? Just say it, lol. But you won't because you know how stupid it sounds.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
317 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2585 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS