19

Based on my understanding (which isn't much, please mention any additional things I missed) Marx believed that the "proletariat" (the workers) were being abused by the "bourgeois" (the owners) in the capitalist system, and that the proletariat should seize control of the state and the means of production ("dictatorship of the proletariat"), and that the end goal was a stateless, classless society where everyone was equal, and that the state would "wither away".

As we all know, a perfect communist society was never achieved, and that the state never ended up withering away for any of them.

How would Marx react to the Soviet Union under Stalin and his purges, Khrushchev to his denouncing of Stalinism and brutal crushings of protests in the Warsaw Pact states, to Gorbachev and his "glasnost and perestroika" reforms?

How would Marx react to the communist states that took power in Latin America, Africa, and Asia? Would he be happy that a communist state was able to compete with the capitalist U.S. in terms of global dominance, twice (Soviet Union during the Cold War, PRC in the modern day)?

Note: I am neither procommunist or anticommunist. I think that some if Marx's ideas were quite good (everyone should be equal, classless society, etc.) but others not so much (history tells us what happens when there is a "dictatorship of the proletariat", the state never withers away like Marx imagines it would, as power corrupts all)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I know better than to get in any prolong discussion on Lemmy about Karl Marx but it's worth saying that he would've probably been a lot more delighted with Chinese communism (educated peasant uprising) than Russian (unguided peasant revolt taken over by urban intellectual minority), although neither really fit in with his deterministic view of history which said that nations needed a period of liberal capitalism before Communism could be achieved, and he obviously predicted Western Europe would be the nexus for this change.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In China they aren't in bread lines and a lot of people there seem to have a stable life. A few Chinese people I know do genuinely say that life did get better than what it was under the communist party. Keep in mind, this country was still getting peasant girls into harems for the emperor who couldn't leave his palace ever during victorian times

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

I blame the Japanese Imperialists for this.

CCP was about to lose, but of course, fucking imperialists ruining China as per tradition.

Imagine that worldline where the invasion never happened.

ROC wins, warlord period ends and country stablizes. Then eventually they start to liberalize. ROC built nukes, maintains sovereignty, becomes a bastion of freedom.

Modern China is definitely better, but CCP's China wasn't the only possibility we have, there are much better alt-timelines.

(Disclaimer: I have nothing against the Japanese people, I'm only mad at the Imperialists specifically)

As for Breadlines... I mean... glances at parents

I don't know if there are breadlines, but definitely a lot of poverty... very underdeveloped. My parents have extremely frugal behaviors... especially my mom.

In the villages, the only bathrooms are the communal ones...

I have a memory of it being late at night and walking to the bathroom with my dad...

Like, you literally have to leave your own house to go to the bathroom lol.

No big roads leading to the village, I remember there being a tiny path and we rode cheap motocycles to... I guess the market areas? That's where you can even get a bus to Guangzhou.

We don't have time machines so we can't really speculate...

But I don't think ROC would be wasting crutial time on some "cultural revolution" stuff and actually starting on building the country. But then again, if Japanese Imperialists didn't invade, it would've been a much better timeline anyways. War ruins shit.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

ROC built nukes, maintains sovereignty, becomes a bastion of freedom.

The ROC didn't become a democracy until the 1990s.

Modern China is definitely better, but CCP's China wasn't the only possibility we have, there are much better alt-timelines.

Yeah, that's basically what I'm saying. However, you can say this about any country. I think the UK would have had a better future if we got "chaos with Ed Milliband"

Disclaimer: I have nothing against the Japanese people, I'm only mad at the Imperialists specifically

You're allowed to, it's fine. You shouldn't need to disclaimer this.

I don't know if there are breadlines, but definitely a lot of poverty... very underdeveloped. My parents have extremely frugal behaviors... especially my mom.

The Chinese still do that, the ones that came into wealth are still alive. I think that's the same with any recently developed country. The house I stayed in China was very cluttered but also very clean. Furniture was kind of haphazard and the bathroom was basic. But their tvs and fridges were pretty modern. I think it's just they don't know the potential, but this family certainly could have afforded it.

In the villages, the only bathrooms are the communal ones...

I have a memory of it being late at night and walking to the bathroom with my dad...

Like, you literally have to leave your own house to go to the bathroom lol.

What year was this? Genuinely curious. I saw some underdeveloped villages there from the windows of trains and manual farm labourers. My dad also used to have a communal neighbourhood bathroom in the UK when he was younger in the 1970s. Someone else I was talking to was recalling collecting water from the well.

But I don't think ROC would be wasting crutial time on some "cultural revolution" stuff and actually starting on building the country. But then again, if Japanese Imperialists didn't invade, it would've been a much better timeline anyways. War ruins shit.

Yeah fair, I think if you put China how it is now, ten years ago (accounting for the cultural revolution) it wouldn't have set it back. Also the one child policy will have extremely concerning implications in a few years

China is such a strange country. The streets are extremely clean minus the dust, the place I was staying had an advanced metro system nearby and endless huge apartments in the area, something I had never seen or experienced ever before. But the water wasn't running like 30% of the time and even when it was, it was best not to drink it and get it from a machine outside. You're Chinese so I cannot speak in a position over you, but I do find a lot of westerners seem to underestimate it. And they think we're behind because there is one bus every thirty minutes to the somewhat big city which is half the side of the centre of their district.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45635 readers
126 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS