62
Do up/down votes matter?
(lemmy.zip)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
62 points (88.8% liked)
Asklemmy
54391 readers
231 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
We'd have a default list available, optionally pre-installed. But this is obvious.
Yes, That is addressable via this mechanism as well.
It's simply another way of doing a forum. A better way.
No, because the child porn would still be present. Not good enough legally.
There is no support for your ideas on the fediverse.
Your naysaying is repetitive and insubstantial. Sorry.
Perhaps focus on a single argument and back it up a bit more.
That is my argument. The Fediverse has to remove child-porn. Simply allowing to be filtered out by users isn't good enough legally.
Moreover, the system you call for would degrade communities as merely being twitter hashtags. That's simply not how this is supposed to work.
If the cp is blacklisted then it will be removed from the listverse.
"It would be bad" and "it isn't how it's supposed to work" are not substantial arguments.
No, it would still be present if someone wasn't running any blocklists.
Yes, they are. The Fediverse is what the users want. If most of the users don't want to end the moderation tools because they find the outcome undesirable, then it won't happen.
You are in a very small minority.
It would be present on a guy's computer and the network would block any communication with him. I think that's as good as it gets.
I think you're dead wrong there. I think that everybody hates being told what they can say and who they can talk to.