98
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 49 points 4 months ago

Ehhhhh I'm not exactly vegan myself, but I do agree that if you can't provide for a pet's material needs, you probably shouldn't have one? This includes space and time for walkies if it's a dog — a lot of people have dogs who shouldn't.

[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

I think the post's intention is ambiguous, it does just say "if you're poor, you should not own pets". It's not clear if they just think all non-rich people shouldn't have pets, or if they're actually referring to an owner's ability to provide for material needs.

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

Yeah we should likely be reading the slop as 'non-rich people should focus on saving their money to be rich instead of caring for an animal with their money which they do have'. It's the conservative argument usually made.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
98 points (97.1% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14340 readers
465 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS