71
An unsettling indie game about horses keeps getting banned from stores (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 week ago by t3rmit3@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Horses, a first-person narrative horror game, was banned from the Epic Games Store just hours before it was set to launch on December 2nd. Then, a day after launch, the Humble store (temporarily) banned it as well. The decision shocked the developers at Santa Ragione, makers of the critically respected Saturnalia, as these storefronts were the homes they’d found for their game two years before it was preemptively banned from Steam.

Valve and Epic say Horses violates their sexual content policies. Humble hasn’t yet said why it banned the game.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago

I’m with you until I got here. What world can you force people to sell shit they don’t want to sell? In a world with anti trust laws.

I like steam, but arbitrary decisions like this is going to get them under fire by the FTC sooner rather than later.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 0 points 3 days ago

This all happened because they had a literal child riding one of the naked adults on a lead and then wanted to play dumb. I dont agree with Steam practically controlling the PC market, but this one is a case of the developers stepping on their own rake and then turning around and saying "look what they've done to me!" I don't know why this is such an unpopular opinion. But I digress. Because in actuality I would simply not buy the game, I don't actually care if it is available on Steam, I'm just saying having a kid ride a naked adults shoulders is very obviously not going to pass their content checks.

[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago

And I would agree with you if that content were still in the game.

If they are disallowed on Steam, with no recourse, and Steam’s market share is 75%, this is the letter and verse WHY we have antitrust laws. They are the textbook definition of a monopoly.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 0 points 3 days ago

If you burn someone like that, they aren't going to accept do overs. "Sorry for what you perceived as CSAM" doesn't work.

[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

A monopoly giving zero recourse doesn’t work, either. It’s a shame, because I like steam for the most part.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago

A federated game distribution platform would be cool. Something no one can own. I dont think that will happen in our capitalist world. But I also dont think this particular problem would be solved by that.

[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

That would be so cool, I suppose we can dream.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe we should just do it. Idk if I have the skills but I'd be willing to contribute. I'm tired of this paradigm, grandpa.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
71 points (94.9% liked)

Gaming

33121 readers
73 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
Whom@beehaw.org
The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org
chloyster@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org