25

In most people's sci-fi nightmares about robots trying to wipe out humanity, the robots tend to be big. But wouldn't they be more deadly if they were tiny? 0.2-0.5 millimeters is bigger than bacteria or viruses, but it's the size range of many single-cell protozoans.

That possibility is bad enough, but we'd better hope no one figures out how to make these things self-replicating. Think that sounds far-fetched? Evolution figured it out with single-cell organisms 2 billion years ago, and they haven't faltered since.

World’s smallest programmable robots perform tasks: Microscale swimming bots developed by U-M and Penn take in sensory information, process it, and carry out tasks, opening new possibilities in manufacturing and medicine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KRAW@linux.community 5 points 1 month ago

Think that sounds far-fetched? Evolution figured it out with single-cell organisms 2 billion years ago, and they haven't faltered since.

The "brain" that is in these robots is incredibly simple and does not have the capability to learn. While it feels like tech is breaking boundaries every day, having any serious amount of computational power that simulates learning at this small of a scale is incredibly far off. The fear mongering is not necessary.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 2 points 1 month ago

I wasn't thinking about the little robots figuring it out. I was thinking of humans designing it, and releasing it (perhaps accidentally).

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And look at the havoc that relatively simple but communal organisms can wreak (ants),

Then there are bacteria, viruses, and other single-celled organisms.

All one would need to do is replicate itself and produce a toxin.

[-] KRAW@linux.community 1 points 1 month ago

But then that's not evolution?

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

3677 readers
144 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS