153

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has filed a sweeping criminal complaint in Sweden accusing 30 Nobel Foundation officials of misappropriation, facilitating war crimes, and turning the Peace Prize into what he calls “an instrument of war.”

Assange is asking Swedish authorities to immediately freeze the 11 million SEK prize money before its transfer to Machado. The complaint says Nobel administrators breached their fiduciary duty by approving a payout to a figure who has openly advocated foreign military intervention.

️ Assange cites statements in which Machado supports US military escalation around Venezuela and endorses strikes that would kill civilians. Nobel officials, he argues, “converted an instrument of peace into an instrument of war.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's not what's in your Wikipedia quote, you dishonest asshole

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

"So he didn’t release DNC emails to make Hillary look bad?"

In 7 October, WikiLeaks began publishing emails from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/07/13/timeline-how-russian-agents-allegedly-hacked-the-dnc-and-clintons-campaign/

" He didn’t get Trump Jr to promote a lie about what Hillary said? "

In November 2016, WikiLeaks asked Donald Trump Jr. to share a WikiLeaks tweet with the made-up quote

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/10/no-clinton-didnt-say-she-wanted-to-drone-strike-assange.html

After the election, WikiLeaks and Assange requested that the president-elect Donald Trump push Australia to appoint Assange as ambassador to the US.

" He didn’t try to use his election interference to get an ambassador position from Trump?"

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/julian-assange-trump-jr-wikileaks-ambassador-offer-dm-messages-twitter-a8055021.html

The Wikipedia article I linked earlier has links to every source. I've now provided them for you.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

That’s not what’s in your Wikipedia quote, you dishonest asshole

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I literally quoted each and every line from my post along with the corresponding Wikipedia quote from my post AND THE SOURCE.

"The only thing I was wrong about was that he had RNC emails."

What the fuck is wrong with you?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have no idea what you are arguing about.

The post that referenced Wikipedia had 3 claims with sources:

Assange released DNC emails.

Assange had Trump Jr post a lie about Hillary.

Assange asked Trump for an ambassadorship.

Which of these did I not provide sources?

I have said 2 times that I was wrong about Assange not releasing RNC emails because Russia didn't give them to him.

What exactly is the problem you are seeing?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You didn't answer my question.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

That's still not an answer to the question.

Please quote the lie.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

You're welcome to read back through the thread to see the lie

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Despite your constant aggression, I asked you to please quote it. If you can't do it, that makes you the liar.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

No, that is not how that works

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

You made the assertion that I am a liar. You need to support your assertion.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Repeating, "You are a liar." isn't proof. It is the assertion you need to show evidence of.

I think it's now clear you keep repeating, "You are a liar." while refusing to provide any proof is because you don't have any evidence.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

You’re welcome to read back through the thread to see the lie

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I can't prove what isn't there.

Only you can prove your assertion.

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
153 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38642 readers
1044 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS