116
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by solrize@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.world

Urban VPN is a particularly bad offender. It intercepts all your conversations with ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI bots (glad I don't use any), and sends them to the VPN vendor for resale. This is nuts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Oh no. Who could have seen this coming?

[-] triptrapper@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

There are lots of people who know enough to use a VPN, but don't know enough to understand the risks of a free one. They haven't done anything wrong and they shouldn't be preyed upon.

[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago

Yes but they're still having conversations with machines sitting on the public internet, whos services are currently given away.

If the price is free, you are the product... for the entire time the internet has existed. It should be common sense that it is happening and in no way what so ever a surprise to anyone.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

If the price is free, you are the product

This is anti-Free Software propaganda. Some things really are free without catches, and we shouldn't impugn them just because other things are fraudulent.

[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

FOSS in most cases is very different than merely using a canned product someone else is "selling".

Precisely within machine learning, which is this topic, it's the difference between running models locally and just using chatgpt/etc. There is a VERY big difference and a VERY different price for entry.

[-] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The catchphrase doesn't mean you should be wary of free software, it means you should be wary of free services.

If a service costs you no money to use, and yet costs the operator money to provide, you should think carefully about how the operator is financing it - because it may be via capture and sale of your data, or other undesirable means.

Amazing and benevolent free software does exist (and lots of it!) but there's a reason FOSS and self-hosted are often said in the same breath. Giving away software for free costs nothing (aside from the generosity of the developer's time) but hosting software as a service costs money, and that's why if a service is free you should exercise suspicion.

Also - a shoutout to our Lemmy Admins as proof that this isn't always true, and for hosting the fediverse for free out of their own pockets, simply because it's a cause they believe in.

[-] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I didn't prey upon anyone. I surely didn't start a company that pretended to offer privacy for nothing in return.

I do however find it hard to believe that anyone thinks a free product such as an AI chat bot is truly free.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
116 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

8978 readers
11 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS