121
PETA rule
(lemmy.world)
Behavior rules:
Posting rules:
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
You’ve caught me. This shitpost is part of my veiled conspiracy to increase oat milk sales using a diegetically attractive Santa Claus. It’s part of my cults plan to ensure the growth of the Quaker Man, who we keep in an underground vat we will eventually use to achieve the apocalypse.
You don't need a profit incentive to have an agenda.
True, they probably have some hideous ulterior motive like reducing animal cruelty. Fucking jerks, why can’t they just want money?
PETA might reduce animal cruelty, by killing more than 90% of the animals they can get their hands on every year.
It’s not 90% and it’s higher than others because PETA takes in all animals, unconditionally.
If they acted the same as everyone else you would have more animals suffering. Euthanasia isn’t great, but it’s the better alternative to leaving a near death animal on the side of the road to bleed out because no shelter will take them on.
At least in 2006-2007 it was 97% of companion animals, and we only know this because the courts asked for these internal documents:
That also does not include the animals that PETA handed off to other shelters which may have also been euthanized.
Can you please link to whatever study this has come from as all I can find on Google is 2 mentions from old forum posts from 2007.
It literally has the citation in the text
So link it - because it's not coming up when I searched for it, as I have shown already.
Here is the link to the Case: https://www.vacourts.gov/static/opinions/opnscvwp/1061785.pdf
As for the two decades old discovery documents, you'd probably have to contact the court directly for those because they don't seem to be listed online.