126
submitted 1 day ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

If there's a single throughline for the PC gaming year that was 2025, it's finally accepting that the pursuit of fancy graphics just doesn't make sense anymore.

Tech has hit a hard graphics plateau: raw generational updates are now nuanced upgrades measured in single-digit frame gains rather than evolutions anyone with eyes can appreciate, and the subsequent pivot to AI-generated frames and experimental hair follicles aren't really revving anyone's engines when those upgrades cost a month's rent. Even if the latest hardware really was all that, the precarious AI bubble is locking normal humans out of it anyway.

It's good timing, then, that cutting edge graphics are increasingly irrelevant to keeping up with the hobby. A bright spot of 2025 was the continued rise of "friendslop," a cringey internet-spawned label for a broad genre of cooperative games designed for groups of friends.


Though it looks like it's sticking, friendslop is a terrible name for these games, because it (perhaps unintentionally) lumps them in with a growing pile of low-effort games cranked out by anonymous Steam grifters every day, and of course, actual AI slop. The well-intentioned use of "slop" probably refers to the subgenre's deliberate use of janky physics and ragdolls to conjure comedy. In REPO, navigating a valuable and fragile vase down narrow hallways is uncomfortable, awkward, and intense—much like actually moving a cherished piece of furniture from one house to another.

But there's nothing sloppy about games with a simple premise, instantly learnable controls, and crucially, with an art direction that accommodates whatever hardware you have to play them on. To have all of that at once and still end up with a fun game is anything but low-effort.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] N00b22@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago

So why does it have "slop" on the name? Should be Friendpeak

[-] helix@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago

Well it's basically gaming fastfood: they're bad games in themselves, and you can only enjoy them with friends. You wouldn't enjoy them with people you don't have chemistry with. Whereas there's some competitive games like CS2 you can enjoy with random strangers because it's a mechanically well made game.

That's not to say friendslop don't have a right to exist. There's a time and a place for friendslop, it's not when you want to play a good game.

I often compare it to mediocre or bad movies which only work on cinema screens or home theater. If you watch "popcorn movies" without popcorn, you won't enjoy the movie.

[-] Ekkosangen@lemmy.ca 1 points 45 minutes ago

Just want to drill into this real quick: a game like CS2 is a good game because it's enjoyable to play with strangers, but a game like Peak is a bad game because it isn't as enjoyable with strangers?

Alternatively, a game like CS2 is a good game because it's mechanically well made, but what is it about the mechanics in Peak that make it a bad game?

Take care to not conflate a personal dislike of the genre with objective quality within a context. Liking action movies doesn't mean rom coms are all terrible (no matter how much one might think they could be improved by a sudden firefight at the climax).

[-] Surenho@beehaw.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I very much disagree, it's like judging that samba is not good cos it's not blues. They're two different genres with different goals. If it's fun then it is well designed.

this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
126 points (96.3% liked)

Gaming

33380 readers
371 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS